May 15, 2024
Depending upon where you live, battery electric vehicles are either gradually becoming commonplace or rarer than a two-dollar gallon of gasoline. A new study from S&P Global has helped illustrate the current regional phenomenon, with an accompanying report that suggests it won't be lasting forever due to the industry pivoting to build more mainstream EVs while the United States expands its charging network.

Depending upon where you live, battery electric vehicles are either gradually becoming commonplace or rarer than a two-dollar gallon of gasoline. A new study from S&P Global has helped illustrate the current regional phenomenon, with an accompanying report that suggests it won’t be lasting forever due to the industry pivoting to build more mainstream EVs while the United States expands its charging network.

As things currently stand, the overwhelming majority of plug-in transportation is sold along the coasts. Taking national sales data from January to August of 2022, S&P Global asserted that 22 non-coastal states (from Nevada to West Virginia) only comprised about 16 percent of national EV sales. This is even reflected in metropolitan areas where all-electric cars have a tendency to thrive. For example, Los Angeles enjoys an 18.9-percent share of the market, San Francisco enjoys 10.8 percent, and New York is closing in on 7 percent while the entire state of Arkansas is sitting at just 0.2 percent. 

However, S&P Global is claiming that won’t remain the case forever. 

“More acceptance and much broader consumer awareness is resulting in a natural progression of [EV] adoption from the coasts to the heartland,” Tom Libby, an analyst at the S&P Global Mobility division, was quoted as saying by Automotive News

He also explained that the 22 states that were selected to represent the American heartland adhered to the term in the broad historic context. But the important thing is that these are places where people are likely to put more miles on their car per year than someone living on the coast and are less likely to have access to robust charging networks like the ones that have been rolled out in California. S&P Global has claimed that, due to the $5 billion earmarked for electric vehicle charging networks in the massive Biden infrastructure package, range anxiety should come down as the number of stations goes up. 

Cost is another factor. EVs tend to retail for far more than their combustion-reliant counterparts and appear in the driveways of pricier homes with nice garages where they can be charged every night. But S&P Global believes automakers are about to change that trend by swapping their core lineups to include more all-electric options. Of course, this also means there will be fewer gasoline and diesel-driven vehicles to choose from in the years ahead. 

“Automakers are beginning to produce more mainstream electric vehicles,” said James Martin, another analyst at S&P Global. “Availability of these vehicles will most likely be a factor in spurring installation of more charging infrastructure.”

Though the mere fact that the group has a “Mobility division” seems to indicate that it’s already on board with the premise that all-electric vehicles are the future of transportation. The term has been utilized by pro-EV manufacturers and industry groups prior to 2015 and is a pretty good way of sniffing out what side of the argument someone is likely to be on. 

Among the states in the S&P study, Wyoming and North Dakota had the lowest national EV share – having so few sales that its tally for the January to August period effectively came up as a zero. Broken down to individual cars, Wyoming had just 146 EV sales while North Dakota had 143. Much of this was attributed to insufficient charging stations, though something tells me the brutally cold winters experienced in those states also played a factor. Batteries don’t perform as well in cold environments and, despite automakers trying to get around this with clever thermal management strategies, it typically means a notable loss in range as the temperature drops to below freezing. 

“While the heartland states represent 27.1 percent of total U.S. vehicle retail sales through August, their representation in EV adoption has remained stagnant from 2021 into this year at a tepid 15.5 percent share,” S&P Global said. “Only Colorado and Nevada (and to a minuscule extent, Utah) out-punch their overall retail share in EV representation.”

According to AN, other “heartland states” in the study included Arkansas, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

“The adoption of BEVs is a long-term process that needs to reach an inflection point similar to the adoption or acceptance of Asian-sourced vehicles in the U.S.,” Libby said. “That inflection point is when the product becomes generally accepted and it usually occurs when volume and exposure reach a level that influences all the reluctant outliers.”

That may be. However, it also needs to be stressed that the industry absolutely has to deliver a superior product to sway people that are on the fence and the reality is that modern EVs simply don’t meet every driver’s needs. Adoption rates may be poised to climb just by nature of there being increased production in the coming years. But there’s also a sense that a large subset of consumers just aren’t interested in what all-electric vehicles are offering. Concerns about repairability, enhanced data collection, consumer privacy violations, and digital gatekeeping have likewise continued to grow. Though material shortages necessary for the production of batteries may ultimately be the largest factor here.

[Image: George Loch/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.